by Mark Grannis - Libertarian for Congress MD - 8th District
Even die-hard fans of Big Government usually admit that a wide range of federal programs are pointless or worse. But often I meet people who are so attached to some particular program that they cannot bring themselves to accept any political philosophy that might lead to less money for their favorite. Almost everyone, including me, can find something in a $3.8 trillion budget that is personally appealing even though it can’t be justified on libertarian principles like
the non-aggression principle. Whether it’s environmental regulations or high-speed rail or NASA or foreign aid, these people essentially ask: Can’t we embrace the benefits of small government generally but make an exception for
my pet program?
This sounds theoretically possible, but I think our experience justifies us in saying it is not. Big Government seems not to be available a la carte. We have to take the bad with the good. And that means that if the choice between private action and government program is at all close, we ought to have a very strong bias for the private option. Because the pet programs we can’t justify as protections of our persons and property are almost never so great as to be worth the high social cost of a government that acts without strong limits.
It sounds pragmatic to make case-by-case determinations about federal programs instead of sticking to a strong limiting principle like the non-aggression principle. But the problem with
ad hoc picking and choosing is that it makes members of Congress practically incapable of saying no to any significant constituency. It’s very hard to bail out banks and then say no to automakers or local governments. It’s very hard to explain why Congress should let the free market work in any sector unless Congress lets the free market work in every sector. And it's very hard to blow money on any program as idiotic as “cash for clunkers” and then say no to equally idiotic proposals like "cash for caulkers" or "cash for can-openers." The slope gets very slippery very fast, and we know that for a fact because we’re currently sliding down it at breakneck speed.